@philrmcknight's Journal, 27 August 2019

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871403X15001210

Secular differences in the association between caloric intake, macronutrient intake, and physical activity with obesity

Summary
Background

To determine whether the relationship between caloric intake, macronutrient intake, and physical activity with obesity has changed over time.
Methods

Dietary data from 36,377 U.S. adults from the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) between 1971 and 2008 was used. Physical activity frequency data was only available in 14,419 adults between 1988 and 2006. Generalised linear models were used to examine if the association between total caloric intake, percent dietary macronutrient intake and physical activity with body mass index (BMI) was different over time.
Results

Between 1971 and 2008, BMI, total caloric intake and carbohydrate intake increased 10–14%, and fat and protein intake decreased 5–9%. Between 1988 and 2006, frequency of leisure time physical activity increased 47–120%. However, for a given amount of caloric intake, macronutrient intake or leisure time physical activity, the predicted BMI was up to 2.3 kg/m2 higher in 2006 that in 1988 in the mutually adjusted model (P < 0.05).
Conclusions

Factors other than diet and physical activity may be contributing to the increase in BMI over time. Further research is necessary to identify these factors and to determine the mechanisms through which they affect body weight.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/09/why-it-was-easier-to-be-skinny-in-the-1980s/407974/

9 Supporters    Support   

Comments 
Yeah this one proved a bit puzzling. It is discussed quite a bit... what is that factor, factors that explains this gap? 
27 Aug 19 by member: liv001
Confounding variable(s). Outlier(s). Hard to say.  
27 Aug 19 by member: @philrmcknight
Stress activity??? 
27 Aug 19 by member: srossca
Dr. Andreas Eenfeldt does a great presentation in "The Food Revolution" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l55OjWS9pEc&t=643s). He convincingly demonstrates the statistical correlation of a decrease in fat consumption, increase in carbohydrate consumption, and percentage of people who are obese and the percentage of people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes since the change in the U.S. gov't "food pyramid." Nutrition policy in the U.S. followed Ancel Keys' "Seven Country Study," which "cherry-picked" data to show a correlation between high fat consumption and obesity-related disease. Keys himself acknowledged that the study was invalid much later in his life. However, the paradigm is gospel in the medical and nutrition fields. 
27 Aug 19 by member: Miraculum
That should be "... and a **rise** in the percentage of people who are obese and the percentage of people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes..." 
27 Aug 19 by member: Miraculum
Yeah, that food pyramid did me in! Who can eat 6-11 servings of bread and pasta without blowing up like a fat balloon!  
01 Sep 19 by member: erikahollister

     
 

Submit a Comment


You must  sign in to submit a comment
 

Other Related Links

Members



@philrmcknight's weight history


Get the app
    
© 2024 FatSecret. All rights reserved.