Register
|
Sign In
Search in:
Foods
Recipes
Meals
Exercises
Members
My FatSecret
Foods
Recipes
Challenges
Fitness
Community
Community
Members
Feelingsad
Feelingsad
Joined July 2013
Posts
2
Following
0
Followers
0
Weight History
Start Weight
242.5 lb
Lost so far:
79.4 lb
Current Weight
163.1 lb
Performance:
Steady
Goal Weight
88.2 lb
Still to go:
75.0 lb
Follow
Feelingsad's Weight History
view Feelingsad's complete history
Feelingsad's Latest Posts
Thermodynamics? Not really...
reddarin wrote:
Crap. Sorry that ended up being a tedious amount of text in one post.
I think that sums up about 99% of what you post
Oh dear I'm consecutive posting now!
posted
17 Jul 2013, 21:23
Thermodynamics? Not really...
Oh dear you just sound more and more shrill and strident, I think that's a record for consecutive posts by the same person!
You offer you tube videos in the face of science, I think Ancel Keys has been pretty much destroyed now by just about everyone, and we all know how he cherry picked reports totally ignoring others a bit like eades et al but more successfully at the time
Talking about at the time European scientists ripped apart his theories but by sheer force of will he managed to convince the U.S. powers that be that he was correct
I almost feel sorry for you now every thing you say just sounds desperate like a man clinging onto a sinking ship you offer nothing and admit you're own arguments do not stand up to scrutiny
No doubt you will post more and more consecutive posts to make more incoherent points
posted
17 Jul 2013, 21:20
Thermodynamics? Not really...
I never noticed the book for sale avatar surely that should contravene the spamming rules of this website?
this entire thread may just be one long Spam thread designed to sell that very book
posted
17 Jul 2013, 16:20
Thermodynamics? Not really...
Dr. Eades did make a response that indicates that Colpo doesn't know what he is talking about.
. The advantage depends on the individual but I think Dr. Eades guessed it could be as much as 300 calories.
This is the funniest thing I have read here thus far
'DR' Eades guesses (plucks out of the air) a 300 calorie figure based on absolutely Nothing and you quote it as fact.
Colpo destroyed this nonsense about 4 years ago!
have you actually read the MAD pdf it would help you stop quoting biased conjecture as science
The difference between a true scientist and someone who seeks to sell as many books a possible is that scientists peer review their work based on scientific principles to see if they stand up to scrutiny and change their viewpoint if they do not.
The idea is to seek the weak points in their own arguments whereas time and time again Eades, taubes et al do the complete opposite and cherry pick studies that they think suit their own, in one case Eades own argument lead to a low fat high protein metabolic advantage!
posted
17 Jul 2013, 16:14
Thermodynamics? Not really...
reddarin wrote:
By the way, clearly I reject your assertion that Coplo has settled the matter. How silly lol.
Cognitive Dissonance at its finest!
You cannot reason your way through the argument neither can your champions yet you believe anyway!
BTW I think this constant referral to mainstreaming or as some call conventional wisdom
Is also somewhat short of the mark, I think the whole Atkins based LC paradigm is very mainstream one only needs to note the abundant threads on this site about carbs and people's obsession with them in the real world that it is clear it is very mainstream if unfounded then again many things are
posted
17 Jul 2013, 15:49
Feelingsad has submitted 5 posts
Other Related Links
Members
Members
Forums
