Cb1006's Journal, 25 April 2018

Well I knew what to expect, just didn't want to see the results. Tested glucose before and after pork rinds on a fast. Went from 73 to 95. But it was Barbecue which has extra stuff.. I'll try reg rinds some other day with no added ingredients. Just curious since most say "not a significant source of protein" meaning the protein gets fried out?

Diet Calendar Entries for 25 April 2018:
2379 kcal Fat: 182.54g | Prot: 149.03g | Carb: 44.25g.   Breakfast: Truroots Organic Chia Seeds, Silk Unsweetened Almond Organic, Kerrygold Unsalted Pure Irish Butter, Now Sports MCT Oil. Lunch: Kroger Moist & Tender Ground Pork, Avocados, Sesame Oil, Dole Classic Cole Slaw Mix, Cauliflower, Broccoli, Litehouse Foods Homestyle Ranch Dressing & Dip. Dinner: Ground Beef (90% Lean / 10% Fat), Organic Valley Organic Muenster Cheese Sliced, Chicken Wing. Snacks/Other: Laughing Cow Mini Babybel Light Cheese. more...
3222 kcal Activities & Exercise: Google Fit - 24 hours. more...

8 Supporters    Support   

Comments 
Pork rinds are the skin and subcutaneous fat of the piggy. So there isn't a lot of regular protein. Here is the FDA reasoning for the designation: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=101.9 7) "Protein": A statement of the number of grams of protein in a serving, expressed to the nearest gram [...] When the protein in foods represented or purported to be for adults and children 4 or more years of age has a protein quality value that is a protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score of less than 20 expressed as a percent, or when the protein in a food represented or purported to be for children greater than 1 but less than 4 years of age has a protein quality value that is a protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score of less than 40 expressed as a percent, either of the following shall be placed adjacent to the declaration of protein content by weight: The statement "not a significant source of protein," or a listing aligned under the column headed "Percent Daily Value" of the corrected amount of protein per serving, as determined in paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of this section, calculated as a percentage of the Daily Reference Value (DRV) or Reference Daily Intake (RDI), as appropriate, for protein and expressed as Percent of Daily Value. When the protein quality in a food as measured by the Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) is less than 40 percent of the reference standard (casein) for a food represented or purported to be for infants, the statement "not a significant source of protein" shall be placed adjacent to the declaration of protein content. In other words, the amino acid composition of pork rinds sucks. PDCAAS is the gold standard used here, which essentially compares the quality of the protein to milk protein. Pork rinds (being largely collagen) are full of fairly useless amino acids and severely lacking in a lot of the important ones. 
25 Apr 18 by member: abbadabba
Thanks Abbadadda for your explanation. I'm not a big fan of pork rinds mostly because of the taste and I don't supplement my fat intake. Many foods have plenty of fat already... 
25 Apr 18 by member: John10251
They're just a low carb snack.. Never trying to up my fat with them. Sometimes you just need that chip like crunch or a vehicle for dipping.  
28 Apr 18 by member: Cb1006
The flavored pork rinds have maltodextrin in them. Clocking in a 110 GI, it will definitely raise your blood sugar like that. Best go with plain and make nachos out of it. Its also in most artificial sweetner packets like equal, sweet n' low, and splenda. Wreaks havoc on the system.  
28 Apr 18 by member: pokeybean

     
 

Submit a Comment


You must  sign in to submit a comment
 

Other Related Links

Members



Cb1006's weight history


Get the app
    
© 2024 FatSecret. All rights reserved.