Synchronizing RDI and calories burned resting/sleeping

previous topic · next topic
Edhurlburt

Joined: Jan 11
Posts: 2

      quote  
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 11:53
As it should be, my calculated RDI dropped 100 calories with my recent weight loss to 2,600/day. However, if I add the Resting/Sleeping "calories burned", it is 3,090. I'd like to get my calories burned resting/sleeping adjusted to more closely match my RDI so when I look ay my Diet Calendar - the net calories is more accurate.

I suppose I could put in a daily "fudge factor", a placeholder activity that would burn less calories than the calculated amount, but I'd rather have a permanent solution.

Anyone (including Fat Secret support) have any suggestions?

Thanks.

Ed
fredmugs

Joined: Jan 11
Posts: 382

      quote  
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 12:59
Forget the RDI. Your 3090 number is the number of calories you burn being alive. That's the number you have to beat every day. There seems to be some semantic differences of opinion as to whether that is your basic metabolic rate but that's what I go by.

As you report lower or higher weights that 3090 number will adjust accordingly. I only focus on the Exercise Activity and it works for me as far as a 3500 caloric deficit equals a 1 lb loss is concerned.
Pain is a by-product of a good time.
Nimm

Joined: Dec 10
Posts: 669

      quote  
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 13:07
FatSecret's Recommended Daily Intake is just a very rough estimate - it's not possible for a website to accurately determine your daily energy expenditure from a few bits of data. Having said that, the estimate is probably not wildly off the mark. But do not take it as gospel; you should assume some trial and error will be needed.

At your current weight, neither 2600 nor 3100 calories is unreasonable as a starting point for your diet. The advantage to starting with a lower number is that you will lose weight faster. The disadvantages include greater difficulty adhering to the diet, and less ability to reduce calories if the fat loss slows or stops, as you get smaller.

You could pick either number, or anywhere in between, and see what happens for two or three weeks. If you lose more than 1.5 to 2 pounds per week, you can and probably should increase calories. If you lose less than a pound per week, you can and probably should reduce the calories.
Edhurlburt

Joined: Jan 11
Posts: 2

      quote  
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 17:55
Thanks Fredmugs, Nimm - I added an excercise to the day for 1 calorie over 3.5 hours. That adjusted my total close to the 2,600 RDI number. I'd rather set the calorie requirement lower and I can adjust as I get more data on wieght loss. After 1 month I should have enough data to determine (pounds lost * 3,500) how many calories/day I actually burned, and I can dial-in the numbers then. I think right now I'm loosing slightly faster than I should based on the calculations (I know, tough problem to have). I'd rather have it that way than the other way around.



Forum Search
Advanced forum search



Latest Posts

Need help working out my weight
There is 14 little lines :) each line big and small is a pound in weight on the outside edge of the scale. Your first Pic shows 11 stone 4 lbs the second Pic shows 10 stone 12 lbs. Make sure your scales ...
by LCARobinson on 26 Apr 15 06:51 PM
Huge weight gain/loss in a short period of time
don't eat more on the weekends, then you may not gain the weight.
by howzat4u on 26 Apr 15 02:37 AM
Stalling/Frustration
ChiBabs wrote: ceecelia... If I may ask, why are you doing the Atkins diet? It sounds like you don't like it very much. You can lose weight eating a variety of foods, including carbs, as long as you ...
by ceecelia on 25 Apr 15 04:35 PM
Out for a Run???
I recently read about a different interval training program that seems to make more sense and should be more achievable. It involves much shorter intervals. You run for only 30 seconds, then walk for ...
by roryneil on 24 Apr 15 10:23 AM
Proteins
Sounds fine to me. As long as you're getting the rest of your macros in for the day you should be good.
by ieGod on 21 Apr 15 02:05 PM