Synchronizing RDI and calories burned resting/sleeping

previous topic · next topic
Edhurlburt

Joined: Jan 11
Posts: 2

      quote  
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 11:53
As it should be, my calculated RDI dropped 100 calories with my recent weight loss to 2,600/day. However, if I add the Resting/Sleeping "calories burned", it is 3,090. I'd like to get my calories burned resting/sleeping adjusted to more closely match my RDI so when I look ay my Diet Calendar - the net calories is more accurate.

I suppose I could put in a daily "fudge factor", a placeholder activity that would burn less calories than the calculated amount, but I'd rather have a permanent solution.

Anyone (including Fat Secret support) have any suggestions?

Thanks.

Ed
fredmugs

Joined: Jan 11
Posts: 383

      quote  
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 12:59
Forget the RDI. Your 3090 number is the number of calories you burn being alive. That's the number you have to beat every day. There seems to be some semantic differences of opinion as to whether that is your basic metabolic rate but that's what I go by.

As you report lower or higher weights that 3090 number will adjust accordingly. I only focus on the Exercise Activity and it works for me as far as a 3500 caloric deficit equals a 1 lb loss is concerned.
Pain is a by-product of a good time.
Nimm

Joined: Dec 10
Posts: 669

      quote  
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 13:07
FatSecret's Recommended Daily Intake is just a very rough estimate - it's not possible for a website to accurately determine your daily energy expenditure from a few bits of data. Having said that, the estimate is probably not wildly off the mark. But do not take it as gospel; you should assume some trial and error will be needed.

At your current weight, neither 2600 nor 3100 calories is unreasonable as a starting point for your diet. The advantage to starting with a lower number is that you will lose weight faster. The disadvantages include greater difficulty adhering to the diet, and less ability to reduce calories if the fat loss slows or stops, as you get smaller.

You could pick either number, or anywhere in between, and see what happens for two or three weeks. If you lose more than 1.5 to 2 pounds per week, you can and probably should increase calories. If you lose less than a pound per week, you can and probably should reduce the calories.
Edhurlburt

Joined: Jan 11
Posts: 2

      quote  
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 17:55
Thanks Fredmugs, Nimm - I added an excercise to the day for 1 calorie over 3.5 hours. That adjusted my total close to the 2,600 RDI number. I'd rather set the calorie requirement lower and I can adjust as I get more data on wieght loss. After 1 month I should have enough data to determine (pounds lost * 3,500) how many calories/day I actually burned, and I can dial-in the numbers then. I think right now I'm loosing slightly faster than I should based on the calculations (I know, tough problem to have). I'd rather have it that way than the other way around.



Forum Search
Advanced forum search



Latest Posts

STALLED AT 225# WITH THE GUNDRY "DIET"
I STARTED AT 245# AND AM NOW AT 225#. BUT AFTER LOSING 20# I SEEM TO HAVE PLATEAUED. I CAN'T MOVE PAST ABOUT 225# MY GOAL IS 200# SO I HAVE ANOTHER 25 TO GO. I AM ONLY EATING BETWEEN 900 AND 1300 ...
by FRED von AMERONGEN on 24 Feb 18 10:32 AM
Calorie Intake
I am doing the LCHF diet, I know how to do it, but I am having trouble figuring out how to enter at the top where it has the plate and fork and knife what my calorie intake is daily so I know how many ...
by tiny beast on 22 Feb 18 10:00 PM
How do I post to support another person?
Thanks so much...I'm pretty new to this so I'm just trying everything to see how it works...I'm really doing what you said to do at this very moment..!..
by VanTL on 19 Feb 18 01:26 PM
Net Cal calculation
Thank you rhills and jm111!
by SDaken on 05 Feb 18 02:16 PM
How do I delete historic (2011) entries that are messing up my nice new weight history?
Lyn, I have entries going back, in stark detail showing my success and failure over the last several years. I’m not sure why you’re worried - there is something useful in seeing the good and the bad ...
by Roblaw2b on 05 Feb 18 10:12 AM