The scale doesn't tell everything

previous topic · next topic
alliecat777

Joined: May 12
Posts: 62

      quote  
Posted: 01 Dec 2012, 11:30
The scale doesn't tell the whole story, so we need to learn not to depend solely on it to determine our success.

About the end of July my weight loss started really slowing down. I had started focusing more on exercise and my weight loss nearly stopped. Taking advice I had seen on here, I started to measure myself.

My first measure was on 7/21/12. I weighed 202.2 at that time. I did my monthly measure today and since 7/21/12 I have lost 22 inches, but only 14 pounds. It would have been more, but I only lost 2" in October due to eating horribly the entire month and really slacking on my exercising.

Even though it is frustrating when the scale doesn't go down it doesn't mean we aren't doing something right and aren't getting results. I really wish I had measured myself when I first began so I could know just how far I've come.
Goal 1: 190-Reached 9/26/12
Goal 2: 170-Reached 7/18/13
Goal 3: 150
Goal 4: 130
eKatherine

Joined: Aug 12
Posts: 1,286

      quote  
Posted: 01 Dec 2012, 17:48
I also found that an increase in exercise was accompanied by slowing down of weight loss.
riocaz

Joined: Jun 12
Posts: 657

      quote  
Posted: 01 Dec 2012, 19:07
I notice my waist size changing in bursts which are always accompanied by a slow week's weight loss. Which is why I track via my waist and not solely by the number on the scales.

42" jeans(25/01/2013) 40"(28/02/2013) 38"(20/03/2013) 36"(25/05/2013)
Down from 60" waist jeans since June 21st 2012.

Still keeping to my 26" jeans, but they are too tight for comfort. too many tasty things in the US, and over Xmas.

Onwards and Downwards! Smile
http://www.menu52.com/
alliecat777

Joined: May 12
Posts: 62

      quote  
Posted: 02 Dec 2012, 09:08
Well you know muscle weighs more than fat...so all the exercise may be slowing down our weight loss because we are adding on muscle! I can already tell a difference in my muscles. My calves are more defined, my arms a little stronger, and when I felx my abs, I can feel them...through a nice thick layer of fluff, but hey, I've never really been able to feel them before!
Goal 1: 190-Reached 9/26/12
Goal 2: 170-Reached 7/18/13
Goal 3: 150
Goal 4: 130
eKatherine

Joined: Aug 12
Posts: 1,286

      quote  
Posted: 02 Dec 2012, 09:13
I also have gotten very muscular, especially in the upper body, where I do a lot of resistance work. I have done more in the past and done it for longer, but I have not done so weighing this little. My arm and shoulder muscles are definitely visible. It is my natural tendency to get muscular when I exercise, more so than for most women.

Doing a strict Atkins induction for more than a week seems to have broken me free, and I'm losing again. Yay!
alliecat777

Joined: May 12
Posts: 62

      quote  
Posted: 04 Dec 2012, 10:53
eKatherine that is great! It's always nice to see the scale move! I wouldn't say my upper body is muscular. I'm a little whimpy when it comes to arm workouts. My legs are pretty muscular, though. I used to play soccer, so they've always been fairly strong.
Goal 1: 190-Reached 9/26/12
Goal 2: 170-Reached 7/18/13
Goal 3: 150
Goal 4: 130



Forum Search
Advanced forum search



Latest Posts

Cycling
NICE !!!!
by rlevette on 24 Apr 18 01:34 PM
Is Fatsecret just for keto dieters?
I'm a 58 year old male and I do as many have suggested here within. I count calories. I started at 202 and am now 186 with a goal of circa 175. I do exercise, 2 to 3 days a week in the gym for an ...
by pds2 on 24 Apr 18 08:59 AM
Scales at home
I finally got a new scale that matches the doctor's office exactly. I would just use the weight on the scale at home and know that the doctor's office will show more OR get a new scale - but it ...
by Fritzy 22 on 23 Apr 18 06:28 PM
Climbing my way out of a very deep sorrow
Losing weight is so hard, even when life is going perfectly. My hat's off to all of you who soldier on through life's trials and tribulations.
by ValerieJN on 23 Apr 18 10:57 AM
BMR with activity factor
“Technically” yes. 1400 calories is a good number for you to start with. We don’t know how much you actually burn. The number FS gives you is approximation and it tends to be on the high side. Still with ...
by Ingria on 21 Apr 18 04:49 PM