RDI--shoot for reaching it or not?

previous topic · next topic
fishergirl31...

Joined: Oct 13
Posts: 17

      quote  
Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 18:01
Questions for anyone out there--

My RDI is 1700 (self-set, FS told me a little over 1900 and that is way too much). Burned 543 calories working out today. Have eaten 1153 and feel very satisfied--not hungry at all.

Most days, I am under my RDI--more like 1200-1400.

If I work out daily, do I need to be making sure I am closer to my RDI, even though I am not hungry?

I have heard that not eating enough can shut-down your weight-loss, is this even true?

I would really appreciate any feedback people may have on this.

Thanks in advance.
"Make it Work" ~ Tim Gunn
Danyellehawk...

Joined: May 13
Posts: 12

      quote  
Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 18:30
This idea has come up a few times and I have wondered it myself. In my personal opinion I shoot for a bear minimum of 1200 and try to reach my RDI each day. I want my body to know that food is always available and we (my body and I ) will not starve. I want my body to know it doesn't need to hold on for dear life to the fat that I have for some unforeseeable rainy day in the future. I think if you feed your body, it feels safe and will work harder for you to achieve your goals. This is just my opinion. Good luck with everything !!
Eat fat to burn fat
mummydee

Joined: Feb 10
Posts: 2,871

      quote  
Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 18:32
I find this calculater much more realistic.......http://www.calculator.net/calorie-calculator.html
If it is a plant, eat it, if it comes from a plant, don't!
Janie52

Joined: Jan 14
Posts: 26

      quote  
Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 18:39
FS set my RDI at about 400 more than anywhere else, so although I continue to use it, I have to remember to take that 400 off my net calories each day. I do try to get to the lower RDI, but it is quite difficult some days, as Atkins seems to keep me very full.

Mummydee's calculator gives me the lower (correct?) RDI number.
fishergirl31...

Joined: Oct 13
Posts: 17

      quote  
Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 18:41
Thank you, Danyellehawkins and mummydee. I appreciate you taking the time to write a response.

Hawkins--the starve-mode you mention is exactly what I was thinking... I don't want to give my body a reason hold on to all my fat for no reason.

mummydee--thanks for the reference, going there right now to see if this tool gives me a better idea of my caloric needs.
"Make it Work" ~ Tim Gunn
fishergirl31...

Joined: Oct 13
Posts: 17

      quote  
Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 18:43
Janie52--thanks--good to know other people have the same dilemma. I am doing a low carb diet and eat a TON of fiber, so I am full all the time, it seems.
"Make it Work" ~ Tim Gunn
northernmusi...

Joined: Dec 13
Posts: 356

      quote  
Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 18:43
It takes quite a bit of work to actually damage your metabolic rate (stop losing weight from 'starvation mode'Wink. I prefer to use the BMR/TDEE calculator on iifym.com BMR is your basic metabolic rate. It normally stays pretty static. The idea is that staying above your BMR ensure that system functions are met. It may or may not spare muscle if you're doing heavy lifting, but BMR while I was cutting weight was a better idea of what I needed to be sure to maintain over a long weight loss diet. TDEE is your total daily energy expenditure. When you exercise, it is this number that pushes higher. That means that you can maintain your BMR where it needs to be, but your weight loss will increase because of the extra calories you've burned from exercise. I find FS calculation of calories burned very high. RDI may fall anywhere inside that range. I tried to cut to within 100 calories of my BMR. My BMR was 1600 so I set my RDI at 1700 or 100 to get my fat losses.
***

Exercise isn't diet. Diet isn't exercise. Binging trumps exercise.
fishergirl31...

Joined: Oct 13
Posts: 17

      quote  
Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 19:14
Very cool tools on that website...mine calculated at a BMR of 1795.

So maybe I do need to be eating more...maybe using more foods that are healthy but still are high calorie wise. I am only eating 1200-1500, plus burning 500 cals a day, and I am still have a ton of body fat. Maybe this is why.
"Make it Work" ~ Tim Gunn



Forum Search
Advanced forum search



Latest Posts

Vox - The Science is in. Diet is more important than exercise for weight loss
I agree - all about diet. Have you checked out Dr. Jason Fung's book - the Obesity Code? A great proponent of fasting and watching how often you eat.
by FrankieBluEyes on 29 Jun 16 04:46 PM
oh the weight
So I weighed and up by 300g. The scale is more than acurate. But, I rather have a scale where I weigh more than less and have a surprize when I have to weigh somewhere else. Will see in the coming wEeks. ...
by #Dee on 29 Jun 16 12:37 PM
Top 5 Biggest Fast Food Offenders
There are some here that say eat what you want, it doesn't matter as long as you don't eat too many calories so your list of foods would be fine to eat. I personally believe food triggers hormonal ...
by mrspackrat on 29 Jun 16 09:23 AM
Newbie Keto question..Help, Please
Net carbs (carbs - fiber)
by mrspackrat on 29 Jun 16 09:14 AM
Protein
Don't reduce fats, or at least the healthy ones. Just get rid of processed/refined carbs, they are useless to your body anyway and are extra calories you don't need.
by mrspackrat on 29 Jun 16 09:12 AM