Coming Back to Fat Secret

previous topic · next topic

Joined: Nov 12
Posts: 7

Posted: 11 Feb 2013, 20:49
So I joined this site in November 2012, but couldn't really understand how things worked. The entry process is simple enough its just all the numbers I don't understand. For example: I ate 2123 kcals today (2/11/13) and I had an exercise kcal of 2526, that leaves me with -403 kcals. Is that what is supposed to happen? Should that number be bigger or smaller, does that number not really matter, because it depends on what you eat? Any answers would be great.


Joined: Nov 11
Posts: 811

Posted: 11 Feb 2013, 21:20
The 'general consensus' is that if you can have a net kcal around -500/day, you will lose weight at a rate of around a pound/week. However, it has also been discussed frequently in the forums that the calories calculated by the FS exercise entries are overestimated (for example, your biking may not have actually burned 700+ calories). If you have an average of -500/day and don't see any weight loss after a couple of weeks, you probably can assume that FS is overestimating your calorie burn, and then you can adjust your RDI or exercise routine accordingly.

Someone who is busier than you is working out right now.
There will come a day when you can no longer do this. Today is not that day.

Joined: Apr 09
Posts: 440

Posted: 11 Feb 2013, 22:27
In general people underestimate calories from food and overestimate calories burned exercising. If you want to get the best idea, weigh your food and use a heart rate monitor. Even this isn't an exact science--the heart rate monitors at gyms, for ex, are usually making an educated guess as to the number of calories burned and some foods are entered incorrectly.

Use the calories as a general guideline, focus on eating properly and think of exercise as the icing on the cake versus something that will "take away" calories consumed. People seem to all have a different sweet spot of calorie intake/exercise/weight loss and you have to find yours. Good luck!
Whether you think you can, or you think you can't--you're right.

Joined: Apr 09
Posts: 440

Posted: 11 Feb 2013, 22:29
And yeah--some say "a calories is a calorie is a calorie," but a 100 cal snack pack of cookies definitely doesn't equal 100 calories of kale.
Whether you think you can, or you think you can't--you're right.

Joined: Feb 13
Posts: 5

Posted: 11 Feb 2013, 22:46
Its really a fat secret topic. Well according to me we can burn all calories and fat easily with regular workout. Last week i burnt so many calories with doing running only.
Gym St Johns Wood

Joined: Jan 11
Posts: 383

Posted: 12 Feb 2013, 06:23
I agree that the calroies burned during exercise is over stated. What I do is report a lower effort. I walk about 3.5 MPH but I record it at the 3.0 MPH level. If I am riding a bike I use the lower intensity. If I am riding a stationary bike then I manualy enter the exercise.

To answer your question: Yes - that is how the numbers are supposed to work.
Pain is a by-product of a good time.

Joined: Aug 10
Posts: 652

Posted: 12 Feb 2013, 08:35
I agree with beets_yum! I do a few low-calorie days, I could have 6 girl scout cookies or have 4 cups of greens with dressing, tuna, fruit, etc. all for the same calories.

But, Scharber, a good rule I've seen over and over is take your "goal" weight x 10 and see how those calories work for you. To me, it was trial and error until I found what was right for me. I actually ignore the exercise calories but I still log in my exercise.

Joined: May 10
Posts: 126

Posted: 12 Feb 2013, 10:39
One thing I've done to help with the Excercise calculations is that I leave my daily routine as 8 hours sleep, 8 hours desk work, 8 hours resting. Doesn't matter than I'm actually walking around the office a lot, up and down stairs several times a day, 1/4 mile each way to my car, coaching the kids basketball practice, light housework/yard work, etc... The only time I change it is when I do actual exercise, in which case I use an HRM to estimate the calories burned.

Also, I agree with beets_yum that "a 100 cal snack pack of cookies definitely doesn't equal 100 calories of kale." Processed foods are MUCH MORE READILY absorbed by the body than natural/raw foods. Meaning, your body might "absorb" 90 of the calories from the snack pack, but only 70 calories from the kale. This applies to all the food you eat, all day long. Which is why people who eat "whole foods" generally do MUCH better with weight loss on the same caloric intake than do people eating processed "diet" foods.

Forum Search
Advanced forum search

Latest Posts

BMR on my fat secret
Thanks @mummydee! That's a great site. BOOKMARKED!
by rhills on 22 Jun 17 03:40 AM
Weight flucuation
It defies the laws of physics if you didn't put on additional clothing, food or water. Perhaps it's just that home scales aren't perfect... Or are you having water?
by Kishlette on 20 Jun 17 10:02 PM
Calories and sodium
If you still want to have sodium, just raise your potassium intake. As you lose weight, your blood pressure will also reduce.
by Diablo360x on 16 Jun 17 12:41 AM
It may be worth trying to add/create your own recipe which gives you the option to then add to your food diary :)
by Chishidarling on 14 Jun 17 03:38 AM
how do i carb count succesfully
I am on an insulin pump for my diabetes and struggle with card counting also trying to reduce my fat intake as lots of food does not have the details on I live on my own with very little cooking exper ...
by allantucker on 13 Jun 17 07:59 AM